Add a comment
The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation released their 2008 report comparing countries around the world in broadband access, speed, and price; the United States comes in at 15 out of 30.
Every year since 2001, the United States has fallen further behind in broadband access. We are now being beaten by Australia.
Last month, we released an editorial entitled: “U.S. falling behind in broadband; enough is enough.” We ended that column with the following words:
What I’d like to see are articles talking about how Americans are trying to solve the broadband problem – not articles dwelling further about how bad things have gotten.
I don’t have any panaceas, but if you know of something – or have an idea, feel free to leave a comment below.
The report from the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation actually does propose a number of solutions to increase broadband adoption in the U.S. Here are some takeaways from the report:
- The United States poor performance is roughly about 25 percent to blame on poor policy, about 75 percent on environmental issues like the distribution of homes in suburbia and exurbia, as well as the very long copper loop lengths that such an arrangement necessitate.
- The culture of Wall Street also plays a large part – Japan’s NTT faces less pressure to continually post quarterly profits; as such they can plan on a more long-term basis. The United States focus on quarterly performance discourages investment in infrastructure that will not show a profit in 90 days.
- Support at the highest levels of government for broadband correlates positively to broadband adoption, speed, and low pricing.
- Competition between providers both inter and intra-modal usually correlates positively to broadband adoption, speed, and low pricing – but not always.
- There is an upper ceiling on broadband penetration in the U.S.; as only two thirds of American households have computers, the maximum broadband penetration can be is 66%.
And here are some of the recommendations:
To encourage the development of broadband infrastructure (supply) in the United States, we recommend that U.S. policymakers take the following steps:
1. Enact more favorable tax policies to encourage investment in broadband networks, such as accelerated depreciation and exempting broadband services from federal, state, and local taxation.
2. Continue to make more spectrum, including “white spaces,” available for next-generation wireless data networks.
3. Expand the Department of Agriculture’s Rural Utilities Service Broadband Program and target the program to places that currently do not have non-satellite broadband available.
4. Reform the federal Universal Service Fund program to extend support for rural broadband to all carriers, and consider providing the funding through a reverse auction mechanism.
5. Fund a national program to co-fund state-level broadband support programs, such as Connect Kentucky or North Carolina e-NC Authority.
6. Promote the widespread use of a national, user-generated, Internet-based broadband mapping system that would track location, speed, and price of broadband.
7. State and local governments should take action to make it easier for providers to deploy broadband services, including making it easier to access rights-of-way.
To encourage the growth of consumer demand for broadband, we recommend that U.S. policymakers take these steps:
8. Support initiatives around the nation to encourage broadband usage and digital literacy.
9. Fund a revitalized Technology Opportunities Program, with a particular focus on the development of nationally scalable Web-based projects that address particular social needs, including law enforcement, health care, education, and access for persons with disabilities.
10. Exempt broadband Internet access from federal, state, and local taxes.
11. Support new applications, including putting more public content online, improving e-government, and supporting telework, telemedicine, and online learning programs.
What are your thoughts on these recommendations?
![]() |

