Recreational Network Traffic News: Interview with Wafaa Bilal - Lessons about dehumanization and technology from a man living under the gun


Add a comment

Check out our update of this story with added editorial commentary.

*Another update on Wafaa Bilal and Recreational Network Traffic

brianboyko.jpgBy Brian Boyko

I recently interviewed Wafaa Bilal, an Iraqi-American who teaches at the Art Institute of Chicago. He's currently part of an exhibit there called "Domestic Tension." There may be a lesson there for those who work in consolidated data centers.

Bilal moved his entire living room into the gallery and now spends 24 hours a day, 7 days a week over 30 days in an enclosed space, and his only companion is a paintball gun hooked up to a Web cam, which can be aimed and fired by people who go to a Web page.

And over the past 13 days, there have been over 6,500 shots taken at him. Some near his head - which, because he doesn't wear any protection other than goggles, can cause serious injury.

Even though shooting a man with a paintball gun over the Internet probably won't kill him, it seems to me to be more than art - but also a psychological test about the human condition. People who choose to aim and fire the gun at him are doing so knowing that they hurt him - but either they show no remorse when they inflict pain - a hypothesis that I'm not keen to accept but would be foolish to dismiss - or because the distance and remoteness of the location "on the Internet" is dehumanizing, and people do things anonymously behind an IP address that they'd never do when people can see your face.

While it may not be as extreme as shooting paintballs at end-users, IT departments are notorious for having staffs that are removed from the concerns of the people who actually use information technology they provide, create, and maintain. But at least an IT staff usually worked in the same building as the people they served - now, IT staffs can be continents away in a consolidated data center. With the tyranny of distance creating a dehumanizing factor, it's just that much harder to remember that the end-user experience is really what matters in maintaining a network.

The interview with Wafaa Bilal follows.

(Continued...)

Network Performance Daily: How are you doing?

WB: I'm fine, thank you. It's up and down, just sometimes it feels good when it's quiet, and then sometimes when I get bombarded, it feels really terrible here.

Could you explain a little bit about the project?

WB: The idea here is to move (*bang*) my living room into the gallery space and to set up a system where you have a paintball gun pointed at me 24 hours, seven days a week, for an entire month. The entire mechanism (*bang*) is hooked up by the Internet, where people can log in from anywhere and shoot.

This is the 13th day, and so far, 6,500 shots were taken at me.

Could you tell me about yourself?

WB: I was born and raised in Iraq, and I worked against Saddam Hussein's regime in a passive resistance movement through artwork. I was arrested by his regime a few times. In 1990, I refused to go to war in his army to invade Kuwait. As a consequence, I was blacklisted and I had to flee Iraq, so in 1991, after the uprising, I had a chance to escape and ended up in (*bang*) Saudi Arabia for two years (*bang*) until I had the chance to come to the United States and study for my BFA as the University of Delphi, New Mexico, I got my MFA from the Art Institute of Chicago, and now I teach there. (*bang*)

What inspired this particular project?

WB: I think it's a combination of things. (*bang*) One, it is understanding the culture and how people interact with each other in this digital age. But, the trigger of this project was that I was watching (*bang*) the news - in fact, ABC news, when they had an interview with an American soldier sitting in a base in Colorado, and she was firing missiles into Iraq (*bang*) after being given information by American soldiers on the ground (*bang*) in Iraq, and when asked if she had any regard of human life, she said "No, these people are bad, and I'm getting very good intelligence from people on the ground."

Also, I just wanted to bring this closer to myself. I left Iraq in 1991, and I wasn't able to see my family, and we had some losses in 2005. I lost my brother and he was killed by American soldiers in Najaf, and I lost my father two months after that. Now my family is confined to their own homes, and they cannot even leave, and I ask them sometimes "What do you do?"

They said: "We are at home, and the only time we leave is when one of us risks his or her life going to the market to get food and come back."

I wanted to put myself in the same physical way they are so that I could feel closer to them and to support them.

Can you tell me more about the technical aspects of the project?

WB: The technology is extremely simple and available to anyone. I worked with a very good crew though - Ben Chang, Dan Miller, and Dimitris Michalaros, my colleagues at the Art Institute of Chicago.

There are a couple of components to it. The hardware is a small-motor connected to a card. That's the pan mechanism behind the movement of the gun and the camera. The trigger on the camera is connected to a solenoid. Everything is driven by software and connected on a web page (*bang*) and so when you go to the Web page, you (*bang*) press left or right, the gun will move five degrees each time, and when you shoot the gun, the signal goes from your browser to the card, then to the solenoid, which pulls the trigger, and simply fires.

How many times have you been hit?

I lost count how many times I've been hit, but, as I said, today the count is up to 6,500 shots. I think day 13 - today - I entered kind of a survival mode, trying to protect myself by barricading myself and navigating through the room so that I'm not in the direct line of fire. But that does not mean I don't forget that I am facing the gun 24 hours a day, and it happens so many times I forget for a second, and get hit.

Yesterday I got two of them really close to my head, and I do not wear any head protection except goggles, just because I wanted to feel that danger from the gun that's pointed at me.

These paintballs hurt and I think it's obvious that paintballs hurt. There were 6,500 pulls of the trigger - I don't think that's all one guy doing it, so what have you learned about the human condition?

(*bang, bang*) I mean, I'm trying to (*bang*) see where these shooters are coming from, and what's behind it, and there's really not one thing that you can say about them. The project attracted so many different people with different points of view. It varies from guys in their office having fun, to someone bored somewhere and shooting all day and all night, to some other people trying to engage in a political dialogue.

That's at least part of the intention of this project - to attract people who may never want to engage in a political dialogue about the war, or violence, or civilians, or lack of privacy, and it's working in that sense.

I always said that I wanted to play with the idea of aesthetic pleasure versus aesthetic pain, to the point that it becomes an encounter, instead of a didactic art. When you encounter it, you are drawn to it because of aesthetics on the surface and the appealing quality, but then, that encounter leads you to something else entirely.

Do you think the pseudo-anonymity of the internet and the distance has a lot to do with how this project is turning out?

No doubt about it. I mean, (*bang*) it is an internet base, and it is using the latest way of communication, but by design (*bang*), I wanted to remove the viewer from any physical impact. You log on the set, and you don't even have sound (*bang,bang*) I mean, you're hearing it right now, because we're on the phone, but when you're on the site, you never hear it. That's speaks of the virtual war that's being conducted against Iraq and other nations as well.

Is there anything else you'd like to add?

At this point, I look forward to when this gun is silent and when all the guns are silent.

More Information:
--------------------------

-Recreational Network Traffic Calendar

-Recreational Network Use



Add to Technorati Favorites

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.netqos.com/MT/mt-tb.cgi/220

Comments

It really is a brilliant project on a couple of levels. Obviously there is the idea of Iraq and the "virtuality" for most Americans. It seems that neither the supporters or protesters of the war have any real connection to it for the most part.

The other great point is the entire "Internet" interaction angle. There has been a lot of talk for a long time but especially now in the 2.0 phase of how anonymity breeds a lot of the worst of human nature (trolling, racism, hate, violent claims and threats) from otherwise law abiding citizens.

However, I think the real tension in the piece is that the artist both expects and I am sure on some level needs to be shot in order for the art to have meaning. This creates an interesting tension between his victimization and the entire system he created to cause it.

Now can we get someone with some skills beyond my capacity to crash that server to give him a peaceful few hours!

This is a really fascinating idea, but the focus on the anonymity of the internet leading people to do cruel things doesn't quite ring true for me. It's true that paintball pellets sting like crazy, but how many of the people using this site realize that? When I first heard of paintball, I didn't realize that the pellets could hurt--I just thought, "Oh, cool, I get to splatter people with paint!"

If I were going to the site under that assumption, I would think nothing of taking aim and firing a few shots, just to see if I could hit the guy. The novelty of it is entertaining, and if you think you're not doing anything but splattering a willing participant with paint...well, where's the incentive to leave the poor guy alone?

I wonder if the DOD is thinking about implenting something like this for reals.
That would so suck. BRING THEM ALL HOME NOW!

I certainly hope you're wearing proper paintball goggles as failing to do so could be the last mistake you ever make.

Very brilliant idea. Just hope he survives it all. XD

The good news is that there will, one day, be a time when the guns are silent. The bad news is that it will most likely be because there are no more people left to fire them. ....although that in itself could be considered good news as well.
Or, maybe....just maybe, we will wake up and start realizing that we are a tiny rock in the middle of a huge ocean of nothingness, and each one of us has only 70 or so years (if that) to create our page of history.

I am honored by this man. I would move the gun to let him know i was there, but never fire it.

The author's comments about IT departments are baseless and stupid. As someone who's spent 8 hours a day waiting for the tech support phone to ring, I can tell you it's not the 'tyranny of distance creating a dehumanizing factor' that makes us hate whoever is calling. It's the dozens upon dozens of callers who have decided to call and waste my time, instead of reading the FAQ, or even reading the 2 lines of text they get when they mistype a field.

I LULZED! :D

What the hell did he expect?

If someone gave me a free pot-shot at him IRL i'd shoot him too. Not in the head of course, but some of the more fleshy parts would be good fun though, as long as he agreed to it...

i was watchin his video for day 14. honestly what is the ratio between ppl who are doing it out of hate and the ppl who just want to shoot someone over the internet lol. pretty sure its mostly the latter.

I don't think I could ever pull the trigger even if he agrees with it.

Post a comment

Verification (needed to reduce spam):

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)